Bringing Wolves Home: Ed Bangs
Wolf Recovery Coordinator
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
"Wolves are a top-line predator. They have a major influence..."
NOVA: I understand you helped direct the program that reintroduced wolves to the
United States, after years of extinction. Where did you get the wolves?
EB: Well, we needed wolves that knew how to make a living in an area like
Yellowstone National Park. And so we began to think about where to get wolves that would know what an elk is, how to find one, and how to kill one -- and
where to get wolves that are used to living in cold mountainous terrain. All you have to
do is look north of the border and you find that next to Banff National Park in Alberta,
and a little bit farther north in British Columbia, you have such wolves. So we contacted
the governments of Alberta and British Columbia and asked if they had any wolves to spare.
And they said, "We think so, but first we'd like you to come up and tag some wolves
and do some preliminary looking to make sure we've got enough." So we did that and
sure enough, there were a lot of wolves. The first year, 1995, we got 29 wolves from
Alberta, and shipped them into Yellowstone and Central Idaho, and the next year, 1996, we
went up to British Columbia and I think we took 37 wolves and brought them down.
NOVA: How did
you catch them?
EB: In Alberta, we worked with local trappers who normally trap wolves for the
pelts. We paid them to radio-collar wolves. And then we went in with a helicopter. We had
several biologists from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game who are experts at
helicopter darting and capture operations. And we had pilots come down from Alaska who are
experts at finding wolves by looking at tracks in the snow. We just flew over, found the
wolf pack or a radio-collared wolf, then darted the wolves with an immobilizing drug. It
takes about seven or eight minutes for the wolf to become immobilized. We put them in dog
kennels that we'd established in a provincial park in Canada, fed them road kills and gave
them water. When we got enough of them, we flew them on a Forest Service aircraft down to
Missoula and Yellowstone. The park guys took family groups and put whole packs in pens in
Yellowstone Park, kept them for about two months and then turned loose the family group
together. In Central Idaho, we released young adult wolves -- essentially teenagers --
immediately, without any pens or anything. Both those techniques worked extremely well.
NOVA: This is what's know as "hard release" versus "soft
release?"
EB: Exactly. Most wildlife
reintroductions are hard releases. But in Yellowstone we thought we had an opportunity to
keep wolves in the Park on the northern range, where there are tens of thousands of elk,
as well as keep the family breeding groups together.
NOVA: How strong is a wolf's natural instinct to return home?
EB: Real strong. A wolf's territory represents the place where their family
lives and where they're safe. If you're in your pack's territory, you have a family to
help defend you, to care for you, to share food with you. Wolves are the parents, the
mothers, the fathers, the brothers and sisters that we always hoped we could be. I mean
there's extreme loyalty among family members, it's everything to them. And if they leave
that, then they're exposed to possible attacks by other wolf packs or families. So when
you move them somewhere different, they want to go back home.
NOVA: How did you deal with this in the context of your relocation project?
EB: Well, studies have shown that if you move a wolf more than 60 miles from its
home territory, it will try to get back home, but it really can't figure it out. They'll go for maybe 30 miles and then think, "Oh man, I'm lost. I
don't have a clue where I'm at." And then they just turn around and go back to where
they started from, trying to re-orient them- selves. And what we found in Idaho was that
the wolves generally moved north, in the direction from which they came, but after a while
they figured out, "Man, I'm lost. I don't have a clue. Nothing looks familiar."
And then they just thought, "Well, heck, this isn't that bad a place. Maybe I'll just
set up shop here."
NOVA: How did wolves become extinct in America?
EB: Well, we deliberately got rid of them, as a society. A hundred years ago,
our society placed very low value on all wildlife. We got rid of all the deer, the elk,
the bison, the turkeys, you know, everything, in deference to other social objectives,
primarily agriculture and settlement. And you can imagine being a grizzly bear or a black
bear or a wolf or a coyote -- when there was nothing else to eat but livestock, that's
what you ate. And as a consequence, settlers really hated wolves, grizzly
bears, and other predatory animals and they deliberately tried to get rid of them all. The
federal government actually sent out trappers who spent years hunting down the last wolf
and killing it. The last wolves were actually killed by the U.S. Biological Survey, which
is the agency that transformed itself into the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that is now
responsible for wolf restoration!
NOVA: Weren't biologists concerned about this extermination policy?
EB: Well, some people voiced concern, but they were a tiny minority. If you look
at politics in the west -- it was nothing but farmers and ranchers and settlers who had
this strong anti-predator attitude and who were just scraping by. With nothing else to
eat, predators were taking their livestock. And so really the voices for restraint
were overwhelmed by the vast majority of people who wanted to put all the Indians on Indian
reservations, cut all the timber, mine all the dirt, and use all the water. The attitude
was exploitative. You know, it's not good unless a person's using it immediately.
NOVA: How did the ecosystems of the Rocky Mountains adjust to the loss of
wolves? Were there any indications that they were out of whack?
EB: Well, I think the most noticeable thing around Yellowstone Park was, every
five or 10 years, you'd have these big winter die-outs. You'd have elk herds with very
high numbers that contained a lot of old decrepit sick animals. And they would hang on and
hang on. So when you got a bad winter, literally thousands of them would just die from
starvation. The vegetation was being used by animals that were no longer reproductively
active. Coyotes became more widespread. Coyotes and wolves kind of compete for space. As a
consequence, I think foxes kind of took it in
the shorts. They ended up being persecuted, so to speak, by coyotes.
NOVA: How were the wolves killed?
EB: Poison, and a lot of them were shot. The dens were found, the pups were hit
over the head. And then the adults were shot around the den. But poison is probably what
did away with most of the wolves. The old stories go that there wasn't a cowboy in the
west worth his salt that wouldn't see a carcass and lace it with strychnine in the attempt
to kill everything, I mean the foxes, the coyotes, the eagles, the wolves, the bears,
everything. And this poisoning campaign, surprisingly, went on until the '70s. There were
poison baits placed throughout the western United States -- even on public lands by
federal agencies. I think it was President Nixon that actually did away with the 1080
baits.
NOVA: What shifted the tide?
EB: I would like to believe information and education. Scientific research on
wolves didn't start until the '50s, and '60s, but people began to learn that these
predators have a very important place in the ecosystem and that deer and elk are the
magnificent creatures we admire because of the honing effect of predators over many
thousands of years. I think there's a poem by Walt Whitman that says, "What whittle
the antelope so swift but the wolf's tooth." And if you think about it, you know, elk
are wily and strong and alert because of bears and mountain lions and wolves. So as people
learned about that and thought about ecosystems and the environment in different ways and,
as more and more people began to work in areas that weren't directly tied with livestock,
people began to have a different viewpoint on predators.
EB: How closely related is the dog to the
wolf?
NOVA: Basically if you drop your beagle in a blender and look at the DNA it's
pretty indistinguishable from a wild wolf. All dogs came from wolves. And just through
intensive breeding we made them look as different as they do -- all the different breeds.
But your dog is a wolf. Many of the behaviors are exactly the same, just with slight
modifications. You know when you scold your dog, how it just curls up and makes itself
really small? When a wolf is threatened, it tries to make itself appear as meek as
possible to keep other wolves from beating up on it. You know when you take a bone away
from a dog, how it growls at you and its hackles go up? Wolves who want to appear
threatening also try make themselves appear larger. The hair goes up. They stand more
erect. You know when you teach your dog to not go out of the yard or not go in the flower
bed -- and your dog learns that for the rest of its life? It's just something it won't do?
That's the same reason that wolves never attack people. Behaviorally, they just don't
recognize people as anything they want to screw with. And they live their entire lives
without ever trying it.
NOVA: How are the new wolves doing?
EB: They're doing great. The wolves bred right away in Yellowstone, we had two
litters born. There were no livestock depredations in '95. It went better than we ever
expected it to. And the most amazing thing to me, and I'm still just kind of in awe of
this, is that people were seeing wolves in the park. Thousands of people were getting to
see and hear wolves howl, which I didn't think would happen. We had predicted that we
would have to reintroduce wolves for four years. But after two years, the wolves have
adapted so well that we don't have to do any more reintroductions. We're done. This year
in the park there were 13 litters born to nine breeding groups. We actually had some
breeding groups produce two litters, which is very unusual. In Idaho this year we had at
least seven litters born and we think we may even have one or two more. The wolves are
staying pretty much in wilderness areas, or on national forest lands, public lands. In
Northwest Montana, which is our third recovery area, wolves started coming back naturally
from Canada. A few dispersers showed up. The first den was 1986. And today we think we may
have as many as 10 breeding pairs in Northwest Montana that are a result of just natural
dispersal.
NOVA: You've lost some wolves.
EB: Yes.
NOVA: How?
EB: Well, there's a variety of causes. In Idaho we've only lost four wolves. One
was killed by a mountain lion. One was illegally shot. One died accidentally. And then
another one died of unknown causes -- suspected starvation, but we don't know for sure. In
Yellowstone, we've had, I think, three wolves hit by cars on the road. We've had, I
believe, four wolves illegally shot.
NOVA: Have you found out who shot the wolves and why?
EB: Two of the cases were solved in Yellowstone and two are still under
investigation. One of them was a guy who shot accidentally. He turned himself in, received
a small fine and that was the end of that. The other one, the guy skinned the wolf and
tried to conceal what he did. He was convicted by a local jury, given six months
incarceration and a $10,000 fine plus court costs, plus probation. So it was pretty
severe.
NOVA: He just did it for fun?
EB: Yeah, he was one of those people that had a lot of trouble in their lives
and just liked to shoot things for the fun of it. We've had several wolves killed by other
wolves. Wolves do kill trespassing wolves in their territory. And we had to kill a wolf
because it attacked livestock. Our plan right now is that if a wolf attacks livestock, it
is moved one time. If it attacks livestock again, it's killed.
NOVA: Who has opposed the reintroduction of
wolves and why?
EB: Well the livestock industry, particularly the sheep industry, has been the
most outspoken opponent of wolf restoration. And the reason for that is obvious. I mean,
sheep get killed by golden eagles, by mountain lions, by grizzly bears, black bears, feral
dogs, coyote, you know, everything kills sheep. And so, of course, they don't want another
predator feeding on their livestock. Cattle really don't get killed by much of anything --
maybe a grizzly bear now and then. But wolves occasionally will kill livestock. The
studies that we've done and that other people have done indicate that wolves normally kill
less than one-tenth of one percent of the livestock available to them. To date, in the
past 15 years in the northern Rocky Mountains, we've lost an average of about five cattle
and five sheep per year to wolf depredations. And there is a private program that
compensates producers for their losses. But still livestock producers have the potential
to be the most directly impacted in a negative way by wolves. And so they've been the main
opponent to wolf restoration. The supporters, of course, are people that own businesses
around Yellowstone or Central Idaho who are selling wolf t-shirts and other tourists
services. We did an economic analysis and it indicated that wolves in the Yellowstone
system would generate up to about $19 million dollars a year in extra economic activity.
So economically it's a big winner, but not for livestock producers.
NOVA: Are livestock producers still fighting the reintroduction?
EB: Well, I think everybody has accepted the fact that wolves are here to stay.
The reintroductions are over and done with. The wolves are doing great. There's been
almost no problems with livestock, and when there have been livestock
problems, we efficiently take care of the problem including killing the wolves, and they
receive their money from the Defenders of Wildlife, a group that established a private
compensation program within just a matter of weeks. So it's pretty hard to complain,
really.
NOVA: What changes have you seen in the ecosystem since the wolves arrived?
EB: Wolves are a top-line predator. They have a major influence. It used to be
that grizzly bears fed on elk carcasses only in the spring, when they became available.
Now there's going to be a year-round supply of carcasses. So bears will have a more
constant food supply throughout the year. Scavengers such as wolverines and bald eagles
and golden eagles and magpies will also have carcasses throughout the year. And that's
going to have an effect on the whole scavenger community. I predict that wolverines will
become more common. One of the most interesting things to me is how, in the Lamar
Valley
area of Yellowstone, the coyotes hang around the road now -- the idea being that they need
to get next to people, where the wolves spend less time. And we've actually had several
coyotes killed by wolves. So I think wolves are impacting coyotes. And I would predict
that within a few short years you're going to see a lot more of the animals that coyotes
preyed upon, such as the smaller weasels, foxes, those kind of things. It will take time
for the whole system to readjust, but already you can see the signs of it starting to
change.
Photos: (1,4) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; (2) USF&WS/Tracy
Brooks; (3) USF&WS/LuRay Parker; (5) Animals © Robert Winslow; (6,12)
USF&WS/David Meck; (7,9) Yellowstone National Park; (8) American Heritage Center,
University of Wyoming, Guthrie Nicholson Collection; (10) USF&WS/John & Karen
Hollingsworth; (11) Animals Animals/© Lynn M. Stone. |